This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more about cookies on this website and how to delete cookies, see our privacy notice.

Occupied - but not ‘lived in’!

Shared from Tax Insider: Occupied - but not ‘lived in’!
By Mark McLaughlin, June 2022

Mark McLaughlin warns that occupation by a house owner will not necessarily be enough for a private residence relief claim on its disposal. 

When considering the availability of principal private residence (PPR) relief for capital gains tax purposes, there is an important distinction between occupying a dwelling and residing in it. 

PPR relief applies mainly to the disposal of (or an interest in) all or part of a dwelling house which is (or was, during their ownership) the individual’s only or main residence.  

Occupation and residence 

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) considers that the individual must have physically occupied the dwelling (although ‘deemed’ periods of occupation are allowed in certain circumstances); intention to occupy is not enough (see HMRC’s Capital Gains manual at CG64465). Furthermore, the property must be occupied as

This is one of our 2221 Premium articles

To see this article in full and unlock access to our complete library of 2221 articles click 'subscribe & unlock' below:
SUBSCRIBE & UNLOCK

Subscriptions include a 14 day free trial
+ money back satisfaction guarantee

Begin your tax saving journey today

Each month our tax experts reveal FREE tax strategies to help minimise your taxes.

To get Tax Insider tips and updates delivered to your inbox every month simply enter your name and email address below:

Thank you
Thank you for signing up to hear from us!